![]() 2012 70(2 Suppl Operative):230–6.ĭeer TR, Thomson S, Pope JE, Russo M, Luscombe F, Levy R. The use of intraoperative electrophysiology for the placement of spinal cord stimulator paddle leads under general anesthesia. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: a prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes. North RB, Kidd D, Davis C, Olin J, Sieracki JM. ![]() Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous with laminectomy electrodes: part II-clinical outcomes. The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Spinal cord stimulation: indications and outcomes. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA. ![]() Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis based on a randomized, controlled trial.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |